Prepare evidence for review
What is audit readiness
Audit readiness is the state in which an organization is prepared for a formal compliance audit — with documentation, processes, and evidence in order. The goal is not to “pass an audit” but to have governance that actually works.
Audit readiness checklist
This checklist is recommended preparation for the chosen audit criteria. Not every item is a statutory duty for every organisation or AI system.
1. Documentation (foundation from L1 — Align)
| Item | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AI policy | - | Approved by management, distributed to employees |
| AI inventory | - | Complete list of AI systems with risk classification |
| Risk assessment | - | Risk assessment for each AI system |
| AI literacy | - | Evidence of chosen measures; training records where training forms part of those measures |
| Incident reporting | - | Process for reporting and resolving AI incidents |
| DPIA (where relevant) | - | Data Protection Impact Assessment for AI systems |
2. Processes (foundation from L1 — Align + L3 — Innovate)
| Item | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Approval process | - | How new AI tools are approved |
| Monitoring | - | How AI systems are continuously monitored |
| Review cycle | - | Regular review of AI policies and processes |
| Escalation paths | - | Who resolves issues and how |
| Change management | - | How changes in AI systems are managed |
3. Evidence
| Item | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Meeting minutes | - | Documentation of management decisions about AI |
| Training records | - | Attendance sheets, certificates, test results |
| Incident log | - | Records of AI incidents and their resolution |
| Audit trail | - | Who, when, and what was approved/changed |
| Metrics | - | Data on adoption, incidents, compliance |
Preparation process
Agree the audit criteria, legal role, system/organisation scope and evidence first. The following durations are planning examples, not a guarantee of readiness or audit acceptance.
What the auditor asks
Typical questions during an AI governance audit:
- “How do you identify AI systems in your organization?” — you need an AI inventory
- “How do you classify AI system risks?” — you need a risk assessment methodology
- “How do you support AI literacy among employees?” — prepare evidence of chosen measures, such as training
- “What happens when an AI system fails?” — you need an incident response plan
- “Who is responsible for AI governance?” — you need clear roles and responsibilities
Regulatory context
Assess scope by legal role, system and applicability of the relevant provision, including the AI Act transitional rules in Articles 111 and 113.
| Regulation | Regulatory context | Article |
|---|---|---|
| AI Act | Applicable conformity procedure for high-risk providers; external notified body only where the route requires it | Art. 43-49 |
| AI Act | Measures supporting role-appropriate AI literacy; evidence of them is recommended preparation, with no mandatory certificate | Art. 4 |
| NIS2 | Evaluate effectiveness of measures; audit scope/frequency follows the applicable regime, not a universal external-audit duty in Art. 21 | Arts. 21, 32–33 and national implementation |
| GDPR | DPIA for processing likely to result in high risk; not every automated use | Art. 35 |
Next steps
- ISO 42001 — if you are heading toward certification
- What to expect from an audit (Czech) — practical audit guide
Content reviewed: 6 September 2026. Primary sources: ISO/IEC 42001, Commission — standardisation and AI Act, AI Act, GDPR — Art. 35.